Thursday, June 3, 2010

FORUM REPORT FROM STEPHANIE ROSE



IMTAP (International Museum Theatre Asia Pacific)
5th Forum on Performance in Cultural Institutions
22nd April 2010 – Powerhouse Museum and Maritime Museum, Sydney

Stephanie Rose
IIMTALAP member, Sovereign Hill, formerly State Library Victoria


Keynote Address – Alana Valentine
• The premise of a play is based on the question what would happen if? To start planning for a museum piece you start with this question. Further, you can consider the most uncomfortable position a human being could be in and work backwards to construct a plan.
• When visiting exhibitions/collections a visitor needs to be able to create a Lifeline of Meaning – meaning that a visit can construct a context or narrative relevant to them. They need to be able to know what they are looking for and why they should keep looking at an exhibition.
• Museum theatre (and theatre in general) is powerful because it allows us to empathise with someone we could never understand before. Sometimes that person is ourselves. Further: theatre puts life experiences into a condensed version that can lead to new understandings.
• A piece of Museum theatre can provide people with an opportunity to connect with exhibits. Ie. After watching a plan they can then tour the exhibition and draw on points from the play: “this is the gun from X section of the play”.
• Alana wrote a play performed NSW called “The Prospectors” about the Eureka Stockade.
• Curators should be involved in the process of making a play from the outset – it will make the outcome so much richer and more durable.


Workshop 1: Outback Theatre for Young People
• This organisation is based in south-west NSW and offers an outreach program for local young people to be involved in theatre.
• They are based in Deniliquin and service surrounding areas, including Hay and Ivanhoe.
• OTFYP started in Hay – a town of 3000 people and 5 Museums. They are very proud of their Museums and they have been inspiration behind plays. Including a play about the girls of the Hay Institute (a brutal home for girls considered bad).
• They said that involving young people was a great way to get the community motivated to be involved.
• OTFYP continues to be a powerful medium for the young people of south-west NSW to engage with their heritage and participate in their community.


Panel Discussion: Meeting the needs of all involved, artist, audience and museum
Panellists: Nadya Tkachenko (Immigration Museum), Michelle Saunders (Scienceworks), Helen Whitty (Powerhouse Museum) and Kim Carpenter (Performer).

• Nadya and Michelle introduced the three different ways Museum Victoria use theatre across their museums:
o Melbourne Museum: Performances by teams under the direction of the museum
o Scienceworks: performers contracted to convey science concepts
o Immigration Museum: Public Programs use drama as an interpretive method within their Education Programs.
• Considerations when planning performances should include: learning of content, entertainment value/engagement, meeting specific audience needs, and venue and budget considerations.
• Panellists recommend using writing contracts when engaging external performers. These contracts should include: payment schedule, copyright agreement, timeline, performer obligations and public liability information. Contracts are useful not only to ensure a productive and positive relationship between museum and performer, but also to leave a ‘paper trail’ for future employees to know what has been agreed upon, or just understanding things that have been done in the past.
• Ideas to overcome obstacles:
o Give staff Street Theatre training
o Utilising the space and the spontaneous nature of a museum
o Integrate theatre planning write from the outset (at the very beginning of planning an exhibition or public program)
o Provide performers with lots of time to research and develop their ideas
• Powerhouse has used museum theatre to: increase schools audience, complete family offer for adult-style exhibition, theatrical settings for the visitor to be in the performances, and students using costumes and characters to interpret what they are seeing.
• Recommendation: if performing theatre in a museum context do not try to imitate a theatre (ie. Black box and sitting in rows). It is better to try an alternative set-up, such as chairs in a close circle.
• It is a good idea to document performances and keep an archive of what has been happening in Museums. This can be used for future ideas, but also to keep a cultural record of our work as museum theatre practitioners.

Workshop 2: Patrick Watt, National Sports Museum
• Considering all aspects of copyright is important (particularly where external providers are including). For example, owning the music or the theatrical premise might be important if you do not want to see the work somewhere else.
• Collaboration with a range of people is great, and keeping a paper trail of these collaborations are important so that organisations are not constantly re-inventing the wheel.
• Played attacker/protector game: Need uneven numbers (about 5), everyone chooses (in their head) someone to be attacking them and someone to be protecting them. They must keep their protector in between them and their attacker.
• Specactor = spectator + actor, Curactor = curator + actor
• Can use audience involvement as a way of conceiving theatre ideas, even if the audience is not actually being use for the theatre. Process drama can lead to museum theatre.
• Teaching drama (and the creative process in drama), excellent video: Dorothy Heathcote “Three Looms Waiting” available on Teacher Tube.
• Theatre director worth reading about: Augusto Boal (http://www.ptoweb.org/boal.html)
• Interesting Stats: Victoria and Albert Museum in England had an exhibition on corsetry. Research into audience engagement showed that for audiences that just viewed the exhibition: 12% left with an understanding of material presented. When they had theatrical interpreters: 96% left with an understanding of material presented.

Performance
At the National Maritime Museum we watched a performance called I, Bunyip. It is a piece in process that is complementing a Mythic Creatures exhibition. The performance explores Indigenous Australian mythical creatures, including: Yawk Yawks, Turongs and Nyols, using puppets and an Indigenous narrator. There was audience involvement and the puppets and puppetry was fantastic.


Workshop 3: Simon Dalton (Old Melbourne Goal – Crime and Justice Experience)
Simon presented a workshop about a program recently developed by OMG – C&JE, called I’ve killed my best mate. The program, mainly developed for legal studies students, was developed in collaboration with the Traffic Accident Commission. It is a student-led re-enactment of a real trial (sentencing hearing, the offender has already pleaded guilty) of an 18 year old boy who crashed his car while racing down Flemington Rd. Both his passengers died.
Each student (and in this case, us) takes on a role and has a script. The teacher is given background information and character descriptions to preselect roles, but they do not see the script until the day. The students then act out the trial. Simon’s session involved us participating in the program and then discussing it afterwards. At the end students discuss what sentence they think he should receive – as he is 18, he could go to either a Juvenile Retraining Centre or an adult prison.
It was a fantastic session. I really enjoyed having a go at the activity and it was extremely powerful at provoking questions and discussion.


Pecha Kucha in the Pub
At the end of the day (after a comedy debate and closing) we met in the Harlequin Inn for Pecha Kucha. Here seven people presented (until the limit of 20 slides, 20 second per slide). It was a great way to showcase ideas on different ways museum theatre could be used.

Saturday, September 5, 2009

Call for Papers

More than an Add-On

5th National Forum for Performance in Cultural Institutions

Sydney, 22nd – 24th April 2010


Call for Presentation Proposals

Submission Deadline: 23rd October 2009


Performance examples from the Powerhouse Museum


About the Forum

International Museum Theatre Asia Pacific (IMTAP) is excited to announce the call for presentation proposals for the 5th National Forum on Performance in Cultural Institutions on Thursday 22nd & Friday 23rd April 2010 with a planned optional day on Saturday 24th for offsite workshops/tours/performances. This will be the first time that the Forum is to be held in Sydney and is proudly hosted by the Australian National Maritime Museum and the Powerhouse Museum.
The Forum will provide an opportunity for those passionate about all forms of performance in cultural institutions come together to explore, debate, discuss and connect ideas and practice.

The forum aims to be interactive and outcomes driven, and will be looking for creative and interactive presentations that incorporate participatory elements.

IMTAP Mission & Philosophy

IMTAP aims to represent and offer services to all of its members and also to partner members in IMTAL Americas and IMTAL Europe.

IMTAP is
· the formal conduit for all museum theatre practitioners
· the overseeing organising team for forums and conferences
· the host for events with workshops, master classes and special guests
· advocate for performance in cultural organisations
· a promoter of academic rigour in the area of museum theatre

Forum Aims

· To provide an opportunity for creative, high quality, and interactive presentations.
· To celebrate the accomplishments of and provide showcase opportunities for the practitioners in our sector.
· To build on presentations from previous forums with a focus on looking at where the sector has travelled over the past few years and to explore where to from here.
· An opportunity to network with other practitioners in sector.

Target Audience

The Forum is aimed at anyone involved in the development and delivery of performance in cultural institutions. This includes education and public program staff and volunteers in museums, galleries, zoos, historic sites and parks; independent contractors who are commissioned to deliver performances in cultural institutions; practitioners in the traditional realms of performance who have always wanted to perform in a cultural institution. It will also interest senior management in cultural institutions, policy makers and funding bodies so that they gain a greater understanding of this sector.


Forum Theme

The theme for the 5th National Forum is “More than an Add-On”. Performance has traditionally been seen as an afterthought add-on to an exhibition, but now it is seen as an equal medium in its own right. Looking at the past and into the future this forum will look at the rising profile of performance in cultural institutions in Australia.

· Does your performance attract as many, or perhaps more, visitors than an exhibition but only gets a fraction of the funding?
· Is performance listed in your institution’s strategic plan alongside exhibitions, publications and the new emerging field of social media?
· Have you ever walked past an interactive in an exhibition and thought to yourself ‘we could have had a performer in this space to get across the same concept’?
· Do your performances provide an opportunity for access to your collection that other traditional methods do not?

If you have asked yourself any of the above questions this is the forum for you!

Presentation Focus Areas
All proposals are to address the theme “More than an Add-On” AND one of the following key focus areas:

· Performance practice
A focus on ideas, issues and strategies to address the barriers that prevent emerging and professional writers, producers and performers in cultural institutions from realising their ambitions and developing their practice.

· Audience development
A focus on ideas, issues and strategies around growing audiences for performances in cultural institutions.

· Access and participation
A focus on ideas, issues and strategies to address barriers which prevent people from accessing performances in cultural institutions both as audiences and participants whether it be due to age, disability or language.

· Strategic development
A focus on ideas, issues and strategies at a broader policy level to improve coordination and collaboration within your organisation so that you have a stronger voice in policy development and planning, and support informed decision-making.


Presentation Formats

IMTAP is looking for a range of presentation formats with a focus on interaction and participation.

1. Seminar/Lecture
Information/research and knowledge-sharing
1 to 2 speakers
Presentation followed by facilitated discussion and questions

2. Workshop
Skill development
At least 1 workshop leader
Participatory, hands-on experiential learning

3. Panel
Information/research and knowledge sharing
I facilitator and at least 3 panelists (we can assist finding panellists)
Presentation followed by facilitated discussion and questions

4. Debate
Information/research and knowledge sharing
I facilitator and at least 3 debaters per team (we can assist finding debate members)
Presentation followed by facilitated discussion and questions

5. Performance/Demonstration
Showcasing work with Q&A
At least 1 performer
Presentation of a complete or partial show with Q&A opportunity

6. Pecha Kucha
Information/research and knowledge sharing
1 presenter (we will appropriately group you with others)
Presenter shows 20 images for 20 seconds apiece (great way to showcase work)

7. Off Site Tours/Performances/workshops
Showcasing Work
At least 1 presenter and staff to meet group.
Some presentations may be site specific. There is a possibility for visits to other locations in Sydney on Saturday 24 April.

Length of Presentations

Presentations (excluding Pecha Kucha and Extended Workshops/Offsite Tours) can be either:
· 45 minutes
· 90 minutes (2 back to back presentation slots)

There will be limits to the availability of time slots due to programming restrictions and room availability.


Selection Criteria
A selection committee made up of IMTAP representatives will select proposals based on the following criteria, while also taking into consideration the forum program balance:
· Relevance of the presentation to the forum theme and focus areas
· Originality, quality and currency of information/research
· Appropriateness of chosen presentation format
· Clearly stated and relevant objectives and outcomes
· Expertise and experience of presenter/s
· Relevance to target audience
· Level of involvement by participants

Questions

For further assistance, if you:
· Have any questions regarding the proposal application process
· Would like to discuss your proposal idea
· Have suggestions of other great presenters

Please contact:

Michael Van Tiel, Powerhouse Museum
Phone: +61 2 9217 0314
Email: michaelv@phm.gov.au

Or

Scott Andrew, Australian National Maritime Museum
Phone: +61 2 9298 3621
Email: sandrew@anmm.gov.au


Presentation Proposal Form

Complete this form by ticking applicable boxes and providing information in ALL spaces provided. This form can be filled in electronically or manually.

1. Contact Details

Title (Mr/Ms/Dr/other) _____ Surname _________________________________________

First name _______________________________________________________________

Institution ________________________________________________________________

Address _________________________________________________________________

State ________________________ Country ____________________ Postcode_______

Telephone ________________________ Fax___________________________________

Email __________________________________________________________________

Website _________________________________________________________________


2. Presentation Details

Type of Presentation:
q Seminar/Lecture q Workshop q Performance/Demonstration
q Panel discussion q Debate q Pecha Kucha
q Offsite Tours/Workshops
q Other (please specify): ___________________________________________________

Presentation Length (excluding Pecha Kucha & Offsite):
q 45 minutes q 90 minutes

Focus Area:
q Performance practice q Audience Development
q Access and Participation q Strategic Development


Presentation title (maximum of 10 words): ______________________________________

________________________________________________________________________


Presentation abstract (maximum 75 words to be used in conference materials)


Presentation Description (maximum 500 words)
Please include:
· Aim/s of the presentation
· How does it link in with our theme and your chosen focus area
· Objectives and expected participant outcomes i.e. knowledge, skill, attitude
· Content to be presented
· What interactive strategies will you use to ensure participation


Presenter/s Biography (maximum 150 words: will be used in forum material)
Please include:
· Qualifications
· Previous presentations
· Publications/awards
· Experience
· If available profile image in JPEG or GIF format (no smaller than 120x160 pixels)

3. Technical Requirements

Equipment requirements
qSeminar room (with tables and chairs)
qSeminar room (no tables just chairs around the edge)
q Extension cords, etc q Data projector q Overhead projector
q DVD player q CD Player q Whiteboard
q Other (please specify): ________________________________________________________________________

Computer Requirements
q I will bring my presentation on a USB/thumb drive
q I will bring along my own laptop it is
q windows compatible q Mac (please bring relevant data projector adapter)
q I would like internet access

Access prior to your presentation:

q No q Yes, ½ hr q Yes, 1 hr

Technical support: (tick if required) q

Maximum number of participants:

q < 20 q 20-30 q > 30 q No limit (maximum capacity of the room allocated)


Please fill in this form electronically and e-mail to michaelv@phm.gov.au

or manually by post to

Michael Van Tiel
5th National Performance Forum
c/o Powerhouse Museum
PO Box K346 Haymarket NSW 1238

An e-mail acknowledgement will be sent out to advise that your proposal has been received.

The submission deadline for proposals is the 23rd October 2009


Presenter Submission Agreement Form

Presentation Title:

Presenter/s Name:

In submitting my proposal I agree to:
· Work closely with forum organisers in advance of the forum and adhere to deadline dates
· Work cooperatively to refine the presentation to meet forum theme and program requirements
· Make no substantial changes in content, format, audio-visual needs, room set-up, identity or number of presenters (if a joint presentation is offered) without prior approval of forum organisers
· To only present original ideas or information for which you have author permission, copyright or intellectual property agreement
· Provide high-quality handouts by the date requested for duplicating and/or an electronic version to be provided for participants
· To provide all written material in 12 point ‘Arial’ font
· Give permission to IMTAP for non-exclusive use and duplication of presentation materials and video recording on DVD and to publish material and all related images onto the IMTAP website
· To recognise that a forum presentation is an opportunity to share information and is not a showcase for promotion of a business, practice or product
· To tailor content and remarks to uphold the dignity of individuals participating in the forum and to reflect a spirit of inclusion, respect and support
· To respect IMTAP as the sponsoring organisation with either positive or neutral comments from the platform
· In the spirit of professional sharing among peers, I understand that IMTAP do not pay full registration costs or make payment to presenters who are selected to speak.

I/we have read and agree with the conditions of submission of a proposal for the 5th National Forum for Performance in Cultural Institutions.

Yes No


Signature/s: Date:

(If submitting electronically please insert your name.)

Wednesday, September 2, 2009

More than an Add On

More than an Add-On
5th National Forum for Performance in Cultural Institutions
Sydney, 22nd – 24th April 2010

More Than Add On


More than an Add-On

5th National Forum for Performance in Cultural Institutions

Sydney, 22nd – 24th April 2010